FROID Psique / Science
This page explains how the product's measures are framed. Literature on voice or facial movements does not, by itself, amount to validation of FROID or its indices.
A map can represent terrain without explaining everything that happens in it. Instrumental reading organizes information; it does not exhaust the person's experience.
IPM and IDM summarize vocal deviations. The seven facial families describe compatible configurations, not confirmed emotions. The AU mappings are approximate; they do not constitute certified FACS coding.
There is no validated correspondence between each acoustic band and a feeling, nor a validated relationship that would allow concluding a conflict between face and voice. The product declares this absence of assessment capability.
The engine update preserves distinct frames, laterality and ambiguities. These are changes in the consistency of the record. Gains in clinical precision need to be quantified in a specific evaluation, not deduced from the reorganization of the software.
The archive can contribute to investigating stability, differences between groups and relationships between measures. We do not claim that a volume of sessions or a three-year period ensures validation. The result depends on defined criteria and appropriate studies.
Request a presentation of how it works, the available measures and the scope of use before deciding on adoption.
